Key Considerations in RWA Tokenization
While tokenization offers many benefits, its success depends on several critical factors. Here are six key aspects that must be addressed during the tokenization process:
1. Technology: Choosing the Right Blockchain
The choice of blockchain plays a fundamental role in the tokenization process. Some key questions include:
- Which blockchain will be used? Ethereum, Polygon, Polkadot, and Solana are popular choices.
- Will the token be fungible (ERC-20) or non-fungible (ERC-721)?
- Are smart contracts required? Smart contracts automate compliance, revenue sharing, and dispute resolution.
Different blockchains offer different levels of security, transaction speed, and fees. Additionally, blockchain interoperability (multi-chain support) will play a crucial role in the future of tokenized asset trading. So depending on the kind of asset being tokenized, gathering market information on the different chains available and its compatibility with different assets should help inform that decision.
2. Secondary Markets & Liquidity
Tokenization is most effective when assets can be easily bought and sold. However, liquidity depends on the availability of secondary markets where investors can trade tokenized assets. Opting for a blockchain that has a well-established ecosystem of secondary marketplaces ensures that investors have avenues to buy or sell their tokenized assets, which significantly enhances the appeal and viability of the tokenization initiative.
3. Legal & Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory oversight is one of the biggest challenges in RWA tokenization. Tokenized assets—especially securities—must comply with jurisdictional laws, including:
- Securities regulations (SEC in the U.S., MiFID or MiCA in Europe)
- Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) laws
- Taxation rules for tokenized assets – Failure to comply can lead to legal risks, fines, or asset invalidation.
4. Custody & Settlement
Custody refers to how ownership of tokenized assets is managed. Several questions need to be addressed:
- Who holds the real-world asset? If it's real estate, does a trustee manage the title deed?
- How is asset management handled? Maintenance, insurance, or revenue distribution must be clearly outlined.
- What happens if the token issuer goes bankrupt? Ensuring investor protection is crucial.
5. Dispute Resolution
Legal disputes can arise in any asset transfer, and tokenization is no exception. Resolution mechanisms must be clearly defined, whether they are handled:
- Through smart contracts (automated enforcement of terms)
- By traditional legal systems (court-based resolutions)
- Via arbitration or mediation platforms
6. Data: On-Chain vs. Off-Chain Storage
Blockchain stores data about asset ownership, but not all information is placed on-chain. Generally, tokenized assets have:
- Core data (e.g., asset ID, ownership details)
- Static data (e.g., asset description, legal documentation)
- Dynamic data (e.g., live pricing, real-time asset conditions) Dynamic data, such as stock prices or market valuations, often needs off-chain storage with blockchain verification using oracles.
The Three Phases of RWA Tokenization
While every tokenization process is unique, it generally consists of three core phases:
1. Pre-Tokenization (Preparation & Legal Setup)
Before an asset can be tokenized, critical legal, financial, and strategic groundwork must be established.
Key Activities:
- Asset valuation – Conduct an appraisal to determine the market value of the asset.
- Ownership verification – Collect and verify legal documentation proving ownership.
- Regulatory assessment – Identify applicable legal frameworks and compliance requirements (e.g., securities laws, KYC/AML regulations).
- Selecting a tokenization platform – Decide whether to work with a tokenization provider or build a customized blockchain solution.
2. Tokenization (Blockchain Integration & Token Minting)
This phase converts the asset into digital tokens that can be bought, sold, or transferred.
Key Activities:
- Token creation – Mint digital tokens that represent ownership or rights to the asset.
- Data integration – Ensure that essential asset information (e.g., valuation, legal status) is encoded on-chain.
- Smart contract deployment – Automate governance rules, revenue sharing, and compliance enforcement.
3. Post-Tokenization (Trading & Asset Management)
After tokenization, assets enter the market, and their management continues both digitally and physically.
Key Activities:
- Token distribution – Offer tokens through exchanges, marketplaces, or private sales.
- Asset oversight – Manage and maintain the physical or financial asset underlying the tokens.
- Compliance monitoring – Ensure regulatory requirements are continuously met.
For more in-depth information regarding the process of RWA tokenization, check out our free e-books.
Challenges & Risks of RWA Tokenization
While RWA tokenization offers significant benefits, it also comes with unique risks and complexities that issuers, investors, and regulators must navigate carefully. Below, we expand on some of the most pressing challenges in the space and explore potential mitigation strategies.
1. Regulatory Uncertainty & Compliance Risks
Tokenization exists at the intersection of finance, technology, and law, making regulatory compliance complex and ever-changing.
Securities Classification Risks
Many jurisdictions classify tokenized assets as securities, subjecting issuers to stringent financial regulations. Compliance with these laws ensures investor protection, transparency, and market integrity. Here’s how different regulatory bodies address tokenized assets:
- SEC Regulations (U.S.):
In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates tokenized assets under laws, which mandate registration, disclosure, and reporting. The Howey Test is used to determine whether a digital asset qualifies as a security, requiring compliance with investor protection laws. - MiFID II (Europe):
The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) is a comprehensive regulatory framework in the European Union that governs the trading of securities, including tokenized financial instruments. It requires transparency in pre- and post-trade reporting, investor protection protocols, and proper market conduct. - MAS Guidelines (Singapore):
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) regulates tokenized securities under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA) and the Payment Services Act (PSA). Issuers offering tokenized securities must obtain the necessary licenses and ensure compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements.
- Failure to comply can result in heavy fines, legal disputes, and even the delisting of tokenized assets from exchanges.

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) & Know Your Customer (KYC) Compliance
- Tokenization projects must adhere to AML/KYC frameworks to prevent illicit activities.
- Regulatory bodies require investor identity verification, which may hinder full decentralization and limit liquidity on secondary markets.
Legal Jurisdiction Issues
- A tokenized asset may have owners from multiple countries, each with different regulatory standards.
- Some jurisdictions do not legally recognize blockchain-based ownership, creating potential enforcement challenges.
How Defactor Solves These Problems:
- Regulated Tokenization Platforms: Defactor collaborates with regulated tokenization platforms that incorporate built-in KYC/AML frameworks, ensuring compliance with global financial regulations.
- Jurisdictional Alignment: We strategically select jurisdictions with clear regulatory guidelines for Security Token Offerings (STOs), minimizing legal ambiguities and enhancing investor confidence.
- Compliance-Friendly Blockchains: Defactor utilizes compliance-friendly blockchains, such as Lumia, LayerZero, and Plume, which offer integrated regulatory features to facilitate secure and lawful transaction
2. Technical Complexity & Security Risks
RWA tokenization relies on smart contracts, blockchain networks, and interoperability solutions, each introducing unique risks:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities
- Poorly coded smart contracts are prone to exploits, leading to hacks, asset loss, and financial manipulation.
- Major DeFi hacks (e.g., The DAO hack, Wormhole Bridge attack) have resulted in billions in losses due to smart contract flaws.
Interoperability Challenges
- Different blockchains have varying token standards (ERC-20, ERC-1400, BEP-20), making cross-chain asset transfers difficult.
- Lack of interoperability can fragment liquidity and make multi-chain asset transfers inefficient.
User & Investor Inexperience
- Many traditional investors and asset managers lack blockchain knowledge, leading to mismanagement of private keys, security breaches, and improper handling of digital assets.
- Unlike traditional finance, blockchain transactions are irreversible, meaning lost or stolen assets cannot be recovered easily.
How Defactor Solves These Problems:
- Smart Contract Audits: Prior to deploying tokenized assets, Defactor conducts thorough security audits of smart contracts to identify and rectify vulnerabilities, thereby safeguarding against potential exploits.
- Multi-Chain Tokenization Solutions: We implement multi-chain tokenization solutions that enable seamless cross-chain transfers, enhancing interoperability and liquidity across platforms.
- Investor Education: Defactor is committed to educating investors on secure asset management practices, including the use of multi-signature security and recovery options to prevent mismanagement and security breaches.
3. Counterparty & Custodial Risks
Even though blockchain reduces reliance on intermediaries, counterparty risk still exists in tokenized asset markets.
Exchange & Liquidity Provider Risks
- Many investors store tokenized assets on centralized exchanges (CEXs) or third-party custody solutions, which introduces the risk of exchange failures, hacks, or insolvency (e.g., FTX collapse).
- If a centralized custodian fails, tokenized assets may become inaccessible or worthless overnight.
Asset Ownership Disputes
- While blockchain provides transparent ownership records, legal frameworks do not always recognize token-based ownership rights in the real world.
- Example: A real estate-backed token may be considered a legal claim, but courts in a grey-area jurisdiction might not enforce digital ownership in case of disputes.
How Defactor Solves These Problems:
- Regulated Custodians with Insurance Coverage: Defactor partners with regulated custodians that provide insurance coverage for tokenized assets, offering an added layer of security against potential losses due to custodial failures.
- Legally Enforceable Ownership Structures: We ensure that tokenized assets are structured with legally enforceable ownership rights recognized by relevant courts and regulatory bodies, thereby mitigating the risk of ownership disputes.
Emerging Risks: Future Considerations for RWA Tokenization
As tokenized real-world assets continue to evolve, new risks may emerge, including:
- Market Manipulation – Due to lower liquidity in some RWA markets, price manipulation (pump-and-dump schemes) remains a concern for early investors.
- Smart Contract Governance Risks – DAOs governing tokenized assets may be vulnerable to whale control, where large token holders dominate governance decisions.
- Environmental Impact – Some blockchains used for tokenization still rely on energy-intensive proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanisms.
Future-Proofing Strategies:
- Implement on-chain transparency & reporting mechanisms to prevent manipulation.
- Develop fair governance models that prevent whale dominance in asset-related decisions.
- Choose RWA tokenization friendly blockchains for tokenization efforts (e.g., Plume, LayerZero, Lumia).
The Future of RWA Tokenization
RWA tokenization may still be in its early stages of adoption, but that doesn’t mean it’s lacking institutional attention. With the gradual rise of TradFi interest, tokenization is bound to reshape global finance. It’s not a matter of if anymore, it’s a matter of when. Some key trends to watch include:
- Integration with Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Tokenized assets can be used as collateral for loans, yield farming, or decentralized exchanges.
- Adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): Governments are exploring blockchain-based digital currencies that may integrate with tokenized assets.
- Institutional Involvement: Traditional financial institutions are gradually entering the tokenization space, legitimizing its potential.
As blockchain technology matures and regulatory frameworks evolve, tokenization will become a mainstream investment vehicle, democratizing access to assets worldwide.
Final Thoughts
RWA tokenization offers an innovative way to digitize, fractionalize, and trade real-world assets with improved liquidity, transparency, and efficiency. However, its success depends on the right combination of technology, legal compliance, and market adoption.
Whether you’re an investor looking to explore new asset classes or a business considering tokenizing your assets, understanding the fundamentals of tokenization is essential. With proper due diligence, tokenization has the potential to unlock a new era of financial innovation.
At Defactor, we're not just experts in RWA tokenization; we're your dedicated partners in navigating the complexities and realizing the potential of tokenized assets. Whether you're an individual investor with a portfolio to optimize or a business seeking to unlock new value streams, we provide comprehensive support and guidance at every stage of your tokenization journey.